MINUTES OF MEETING STONEYBROOK SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Stoneybrook South Community Development District was held Monday, February 2, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. at Oasis Club at ChampionsGate, 1520 Oasis Club Blvd., ChampionsGate, Florida. Present and constituting a quorum: Chris Manjourides Chairman Terry Siron joined late by phone Vice Chairman Ron Phillips Assistant Secretary Larry Bickel Assistant Secretary Gerard Knights Assistant Secretary Also present were: Jeremy LeBrun District Manager GMS Alan Scheerer Field Manager Vivek Babbar by phone District Counsel Jason Allgood by phone District Engineer FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Roll Call Mr. LeBrun called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. Four Supervisors were present in person constituting a quorum. SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Public Comment Period Mr. LeBrun: The next item is the public comment period. This is the time for members of the public to make a statement to the Board if they wish. We just ask you to state your name and address and then try to keep it under three minutes. Resident (Neil Roberts, 8867 Backspin Lane): I'm here representing the country club Board of Directors. I see that you do have on the agenda an item to discuss the golf course pond maintenance. Our attorney did draft up an agreement which was sent to Vivek Babbar on January 26th for his review. If there are any questions around that during that agenda item, I'm here to answer those questions. Mr. LeBrun: Thank you. THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS Business Administration A. Approval of the Minutes of the October 6, 2025 Board of Supervisors Meeting Mr. LeBrun: That brings us down to item number three. You have the minutes of the October 6, 2025 Board of Supervisors meeting. Happy to take any corrections. If not, just need a motion to approve that. On MOTION by Mr. Manjourides, seconded by Mr. Knights, with all in favor, the Minutes of the October 6, 2025 Board of Supervisors Meeting, were approved. *Supervisor Terry Siron joined via phone at this time. B. Consideration of Check Register Mr. LeBrun: You have the check register from September 30, 2025 through January 26, 2026. We skipped a meeting so that's why the check register is a little longer than usual. It's on page 27 of your electronic agendas. We have checks 280 through 325 out of the general fund totaling $1,947,380.31. You'll notice that number is high just because the assessments are being collected and those flow through the District yearly assessments on the tax bill, so that's why that number is a little higher. From your capital reserve, you have checks five through nine. Total there is $95,651.28. Then from our payroll fund, checks 50147 through 50151 for a total of $848.50. And then the total for the check register is $2,043,880.09. Behind that, you have all the line by line for the check register. Happy to take any questions on that. If not, we just need a motion to approve that check register. Mr. Bickel: Quick question on the assessment side of it. Is that what 308 and 310 are for? Mr. LeBrun: What page are you looking on? Mr. Bickel: I'm looking at 27. It's 1.4 million. Mr. LeBrun: Correct. The assessments get collected via the tax collector and then they go into the CDD and then they flow into their various accounts. It shows up in the check register because it's being taken in and then sent back out to where it needs to be. That usually only happens during this window. When most tax collect collectors come in November, December, January, we’ll pay normally earlier on time. Any other questions? If not, we just need a motion to approve the check register. On MOTION by Mr. Knights, seconded by Mr. Phillips, with all in favor, the Check Register, was approved. C. Balance Sheet and Income Statement Mr. LeBrun: Behind that, you have your balance sheet and income statement. Those are just your unaudited financials. No action required on the Board's part. FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Business Items A. Consideration of Arbitrage Engagement Proposal from LLS Tax Solutions, Inc. Mr. LeBrun: That brings us down to item 4A. The first one is the arbitrage engagement proposal from LLS Tax Solutions. We engaged with a third party vendor to do the tax rebate calculations on the bonds. Essentially, you're not able to earn more interest than you're paying. This is the firm that does those annual calculations. This is just an engagement letter to, they do it every year, this is just for them to do it for the upcoming up year. If there is no questions on it, just need a motion to approve that. On MOTION by Mr. Manjourides, seconded by Mr. Knights, with all in favor, the Arbitrage Engagement Proposal from LLS Tax Solutions, Inc., was approved. B. Presentation of Arbitrage Report for Series 2014 Bonds Mr. LeBrun: Under that we have 4B, the presentation of the arbitrage rebate series. This is for the Series 2014 bonds. This is one of those calculations that they do. This report shows that there's no tax rebate liability, which is good news. There are no tax issues that we have. I can take any questions on it? If not, we just need a motion to accept that report. On MOTION by Mr. Manjourides, seconded by Mr. Knights, with all in favor, Accepting the Arbitrage Report for Series 2014 Bonds, was approved. C. Ratification of Data Sharing and Usage Agreement with Osceola County Property Appraiser Mr. LeBrun: Item 4C is the ratification of the Data Sharing and Usage Agreement with Osceola County Property Appraiser. This is an agreement that we enter into every year, it is pretty standard. Essentially, we're pledging not to share any confidential information that they may have gave us. Sometimes people have redacted property identification IDs, things of that nature. This is just saying we agree to respect that usage of those records. I already signed this on behalf of the District. We do this every single year in all of our Districts. I just need a motion to ratify that if there are no questions on it. On MOTION by Mr. Knights, seconded by Mr. Phillips, with all in favor, the Data Sharing and Usage Agreement with Osceola County Property Appraiser, was ratified. D. Discussion of Golf Course Pond Maintenance Mr. LeBrun: Next we have item 4D. This is discussion of the golf course pond maintenance. Just as a reminder, the last several meetings we've been working with different representatives to get some ideas of the maintenance on the golf course ponds, who's responsible, and what might be the best path forward. The District engineer was doing a lot of research on it. We have him on the line, and District counsel is here as well. Vivek, did you want to start us off with this? I know you received a letter from their counsel. We also have their representative is sitting with us as well. I know the letter they sent discussed the path forward with who's doing maintenance and whatnot. Mr. Babbar: Yeah, happy to talk about it at a high level. If there are any questions I have about the District responsibility, I'll certainly defer to Jason because he's the expert there. As Jeremy had mentioned, there's been follow up discussions in the past month. In December I received a letter from their attorney outlining the folio specifically that are in the District's name and that they believe were the District's responsibility. District staff looked into it. We did confirm that on the SWFWMD permit the District is the operational entity responsible for these ponds, even though they're adjacent to the golf course. Therefore, it really wasn't on the District's radar. I believe the developer had conveyed it or this is at the time where developer controlled the Board essentially. There were some concerns with regular routine maintenance for pond treatments and aquatic vegetation. They also have some current concerns with the structural aspect of it, the bulkhead, which is part of the functioning system itself. That is again confirmed to be the District's obligation and responsibility. A couple weeks ago we did receive, as was mentioned by the president, an agreement essentially saying that the association would be willing to maintain the functional aspects of the pond and the aesthetics. So, the actual water quality, the vegetation, the mowing, if the District would reimburse them for those actual costs and they're already maintaining other parts of the property. We don't have a cost estimate on those items from the association. I think GMS might have been trying to find those cost estimates as well, but they would want the District to maintain responsibility for any structural elements of the system as well. Again, this is going to be a District obligation. I'm not sure if we have funding or we can pull from any reserves or anything like that. It seems like it's in relatively good condition with respect to the aesthetics and the stormwater quality. There are some concerns with the structural bulkheads so that's something that we either need to start planning for now or budgeting for. It's only going to get more expensive if we don't address it sooner rather than later. The association is working with both CDDs and the association is that jurisdiction in both. I don't know if that CDD has met yet or if they're taking actions. It's not simply just a one issue. Unfortunately, it impacts both communities. Mr. Knights: Is there an estimate of what this bulkhead will cost? Mr. Scheerer: I don’t have one. Mr. Roberts: If you want, Jerry, we did some research probably three years ago at that time for 18 only and it was about half a million. But you'd have to do your own assessment now. Mr. LeBrun: We do have Jason, District engineer on the line. Another part of the discussion was for the bulkhead, does it serve a purpose as part of the stormwater system, or does it serve the purpose of making the golf hole playable? There was some discussion of does the bulkhead need to be there per the stormwater permit? That's another area I know the engineer was looking at. The difference of like, is the bulkhead there because of the golf course or is the bulkhead there because of the stormwater pond? Two very different things. Another thing to keep in mind is if the CDD is going to maintain the pond, we would do it per the permit, not necessarily per the golf courses wishes. There's a difference of if they maintain it, they can put the standard they want it to be. Whereas as a stormwater entity management purposes, we're bound by the permit and maintaining it per the permit. Mr. Knights: And that's the bucket on 18 we're talking about, right? Mr. Phillips: Yes. Mr. Knights: But there’s one that’s right below the bunker. Mr. Scheerer: Yes. Mr. LeBrun: And we do have Jason on. Jason, did you want to add anything or maybe fill in some of the gaps or supervisors have questions related to the stormwater part of it? Mr. Allgood: No. What you've covered is correct. There was some question at one point, but the more we look at the permit and the wording, the way water management would look at it, I think it would be under the CDD's maintenance from their perspective and the documents that are in there. I think it's just a matter of what is required by the permit versus what the golf course might want to see from the aesthetic side and covering some of those differences. But in the end, I think it's determining what's required for the bulkhead to look at those and trying to find if there is any documents out there. Mr. Phillips: I'd like to ask an engineering question on that. If the bulkhead were gone, could you replace it with riprap along there to stop erosion? Mr. Allgood: Part of the question going back forth was could you remove the bulkheads and still have the golf course playable? I think there's areas where the golf course is being supported by those bulkheads you would have to look at, say there's a bunker or something right against the edge and some grading. You'd have to relook at some of those areas of being regraded or manipulated, modified to make it work so that your slopes are stable. Riprap is possible, but a lot of times if the slopes are still steep, water goes in between them and starts to erode anyways. But it's something you can look at, but it's not as simple as pulling the bulkheads out and going, okay, you're good. There are areas that are, like, being supported where there are other areas where you're like, you could just simply regrade back, and you wouldn't need them. Mr. Manjourides: What about since you're going to have to replace it, changing where the bulkhead is, maybe moving it in like 10 feet and grading it down slowly so that you didn't need a bulkhead. Mr. Phillips: You mean take the bulkhead out? Mr. Manjourides: Take the bulkhead out. Make the lake a little smaller and grade it so that it would be like on the other side. The bulkheads only on two sides. Right? Mr. Roberts: Bear in mind, the 16 has bulkheads as well. Mr. Manjourides: I understand. We're talking about the 18th right now. I was just wondering if engineering, because you're going to have to replace it anyways, could you take it out and then move it back and grade it from maybe 10ft away? Mr. Knights: That's a lot of fill. That’s deep right there. Mr. Manjourides: But I'm just saying, you have to spend a half a million dollars on the bulkhead, maybe this way you wouldn't have to replace it again. Mr. Allgood: Are you talking about moving it further in toward the pond? Mr. Manjourides: Making the lake smaller. Yeah. Mr. Allgood: No. I can’t reduce the lake size. The stormwater calculation requires certain volume. We're not going to reduce it. What I would say is, in my mind, if you're looking at replacing something and it's going to cost you money and you look at areas and go, well, we don't need it there, I would say don’t put as much bulkhead back. I would say the areas that you go, hey, there's no way to remove the bulkhead without having some more extensive modifications of the golf course and you put it back as is and you make it maybe a little stronger and deeper to make sure they have a longer maintenance period or replacement period. But areas where you don't need it, I would pull it out and just regrade, and that's how I would do it to save money. Mr. Manjourides: Yep. Okay. Mr. Allgood: That’s just my thoughts on it from a cost standpoint. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Phillips: I don’t think you need that bulkhead along the west side of that lake where that other bunker is. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah, right. Mr. Phillips: Where everybody hits the ball in the water. We don't need the bulkhead there. I don't think I need to grade that off because it's not as deep right there. Mr. Manjourides: Right. I think that we should get together with the golf club or whoever maintenance is, and maybe they want to change where the hole is a little bit, maybe make the hole not as graded because you're going to have to take that bulkhead out, maybe make the grade where the hole is, comes straight across and then come down on something. Mr. Phillips: We at one time were going to put a waterfall in there, remember, and get rid of that bulkhead totally. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. Mr. Phillips: But that went through. Mr. LeBrun: And I would also add in, too. So, there was an agreement, a proposal for the HOA to maintain it. Now, it's still the CDD going to be paying for it. Mr. Manjourides: Right. Mr. LeBrun: Essentially now, the only thing I would caution is if they're going to be maintaining it and we're paying the bills after the fact, we might not have the ability to have input into what maintenance is being performed. So, if it's above the level of standard of the permit, there might be some costs that are unnecessary. Mr. Manjourides: I see. Okay. I understand what you’re saying. Mr. LeBrun: Whereas if the CDD is owner and maintenance of the entity, the Board would control what maintenance would be done. So, a normal pond spraying that we do on all of our other Ponds that aren't on the golf course is one cost. But in this version of the HOA, of the association that owns it, they're basically doing all the work and they're just billing the District. So just something to think about. Mr. Manjourides: I’d like to put that into the agreement. Mr. LeBrun: And since we do operate as with a cost share with Stoneybrook South at ChampionsGate, their Board meets today as well, and we'll discuss. I just want to make sure the Board's aware of that distinction if the CDD did the maintenance, we would do the maintenance that's necessary. Mr. Manjourides: The other thing I want to ask is let's say we do the two ponds, and it was like a million dollars. Will we have an assessment or. Mr. LeBrun: So, there's capital reserves. I don't know the costs of them. There are capital reserves that can be used for capital projects. So that is available, but if there's not enough, you would have to get the funds from assessments. Mr. Manjourides: How does that. Do we just vote on it? Mr. LeBrun: So, what would happen if that's something the Board was looking at as part of the annual budget know, we might budget for that capital expenditure. Be it better reserves or if there needed to be an assessment increase, essentially you would vote whatever assessment increase is that gets passed during the normal budget process, at like the public hearing when you adopt the budget, then the assessments are raised, it would be on their tax bill. That is an option to raise assessments. I know it's never popular. Like I said, you guys do have a pretty healthy capital fund reserve, but that would probably be a pretty large chunk of it. If it could cover it all, it would be pretty substantial according to what their research from three years ago. Mr. Knights: I was saying a million dollars for two, but it's probably higher than that now. Mr. Phillips: Well, I guess a million dollars is for what type of wall? Another crappy wall that’s there or we put up a nice stone wall. Mr. Scheerer: It is the bulkhead right now at a level where it needs to be done within the next 12 months. Could be something that could be budgeted for over the next couple of years, so you're not impacted. Mr. Manjourides: I would like to see something that's more aesthetically pleasing than a bulkhead. Mr. Knights: Like a stone wall. Mr. Manjourides: It could be what I'm saying we need to get a hold of the architects, and the designers and figure out, and the golf club might want to. Like I said, they might want to do something with that hole. Mr. Knights: We could put out an RFP to some contractors and find out what they come back with. Mr. Manjourides: Right. And what is, the 16th is the other hole that you wanted to do? Mr. Roberts: Well, the 16th has a bulkhead. Mr. Manjourides: Just two holes, right? Mr. Roberts: 15. Sorry. Mr. Manjourides: 15. So, it’s 15 and 18. Just two. Right? Mr. Knights: Yeah. Mr. Manjourides: So, we should maybe get a hold of. I don’t know. Mr. Phillips: I think 15 would be a lot easier than 18 because the water level’s down low most of the time. And you can just build something actually in front of that without doing anything and then rip that out and fill it. Mr. Manjourides: You mean in cost? Mr. Phillips: Yeah, in cost. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah, probably. I think that we need to get the. Mr. Knights: What's the one that's more critical, 18 or 15? 18, right. Mr. Scheerer: I thought it was 18. In all the conversations that I heard was 18. Mr. Phillips: The whole top of it is starting to flake off. Mr. Manjourides: Is there like a design architect that does golf courses or something? Mr. Knights: Yeah. You get somebody that does hardscape. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. Mr. Knights: There’s a lot of hardscape contractors out there. Mr. Scheerer: I’m sure the engineer could point us in the right direction. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. Mr. Scheerer: We’d have to go through the engineer and just see. Mr. Manjourides: Are we going to need a motion for that? Mr. Knights: Will we write an RFP and see what they come back with? Mr. LeBrun: No, I mean for staff just to gather information. You don't have to do a motion or anything. But now if it's a project that's over a certain, you know, there's a bid threshold where we have to go through the public bid process, eventually, once we figure out if the bulkhead's needed for the storm water, just for the golf course. So, I think some of that starts to be ironed out. But, yeah, we would go through the bid process and do all that. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. I think too is. Mr. Babbar: One thing, like Jeremy said, that as we go down this process, if we're talking about making more aesthetic tech hinges for the benefit of the golf course, we might have to have a cautionary component with the golf course contributes as well, simply because then we can't use public funds for what's essentially a private amenity. So, yeah, anytime you go too far into it versus the function of the bulkhead or the stormwater system, we have to make sure that we don't run afoul of any public dollars being spent on private benefits. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Knights: But putting up a better wall would be better in the long run than have to replace it again in another 15 years. Mr. Babbar: Agree. Yeah. It would just be if we have any aesthetic options that are requested by the golf course or anything like that, maybe it's just that differential that they provide a cost share, but if it's strictly for something, a better product that will last longer, we won't have an issue. That's certainly something that CDD can fully fund on its own. Mr. Knights: I get that. Mr. LeBrun: So, we're just operating purely as a storm water management entity. That is all we're concerned about, basically. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Phillips: But they're not concerned about quality. I mean you could put any junk wall there. Mr. LeBrun: I think as long as the engineer has an acceptable stormwater repair method, the engineer signs off on it. I think that's the litmus test. Is it an acceptable stormwater repair or is it more for the golf. Mr. Phillips: Is it possible to have the HOA showing a couple dollars just to make it more aesthetic while we are putting up the wall. Like a joint thing. Mr. LeBrun: Where we're covering the actual cost of what a stormwater repair is. And if they're going to pay for something else, Vivek might be able to differentiate the two. The two costs. Mr. Babbar: Yeah. Absolutely. That can be arranged. Mr. Knights: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Manjourides: So, what do we want to do? Mr. Phillips: Where does that leave us? Mr. Knights: We want to find out if there’s people to do this. Mr. LeBrun: So, where that leaves us at. I guess the Board will have, we'll also meet with the other Board later, we are responsible for the management of the stormwater whether or not we want the CDD to take on that on their own, have control over that process, or the HOA is going to, or the associate's going to manage it and bill us. That's another option. So really just maybe want to give staff some way to steer us which way you want us to start investigating. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. I would like to get some bids on the replacement of the two bulkheads from a company that works with golf courses so that we can see what it's going to cost and how different styles that they have. The other thing is, I would like to include the golf club maintenance people so that they might have some recommendation on the height or the angle of where they're going to be cutting the grass and stuff around there. It might be easier for them. Mr. LeBrun: You know what, in the golf course, they may have better contacts within the industry to maybe get an updated proposal that would also maybe we wouldn't have to go through. If we're going to do a formal bid, we have to go through the formal bid. But if they have contacts and they have an estimate they could send us and say, “hey, here's what if we did it on our own, here's what it would cost.” It might help at least put some guardrails up for how much it could be. Mr. Manjourides: Like I said before that hole 18 could be raised a little bit, maybe so that wall, maybe another foot up the slope wouldn't be as bad. You know what I'm saying? Mr. Phillips: While we're on stormwater, I have a question. On 18, there's that stormwater. Not 18. I'm sorry, eight. Mr. Manjourides: Oh, on eight. Mr. Phillips: On eight, there’s that pond is stormwater. And when it rains a lot, the water comes up into the fairway. Mr. Manjourides: Right. Mr. Knights: Because the fairway is lower than the pond. Mr. Manjourides: That’s right. Mr. Phillips: Is there not a way to stop that? Mr. Scheerer: Where is eight? Mr. Phillips: Eight is the one by the maintenance shed off of Bella Citta. You see the flag right there? Mr. Knights: The green is right on Bella Citta. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. It’s where the Bella Citta and Blackwolf? Mr. Phillips: Yeah. Mr. Scheerer: That Pond that’s right there? Mr. Knights: The one before that up by the tee box. Mr. Phillips: The one before that by the tee box. Mr. Scheerer: Okay. Mr. Knights: Okay. There’s two ponds on that hole. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. Yeah. Mr. Knights: There’s one by the tee box and then there’s a storm drain in the middle of the fairway. Mr. Phillips: Where you put the fountain in in the back. Mr. Scheerer: Right. Mr. Knights: So, there is a storm drain in the middle of the fairway. Mr. Scheerer: Okay. Mr. Knights: Just over the cart path, maybe 20 yards. Okay. That drains. Top level is lower than the pond when we get heavy rain. So, guess what? The water comes back up and fills the fairway. Mr. Scheerer: We’ll have to have the engineer take a look at that. Mr. Phillips: My question would be, is there a way to make that pond either deeper or to get more volume? Right. I’m talking to the engineer. To get it deeper or wider. There's a place there, a couple places where you can widen that pond so that the water, when it does rain, doesn't come up onto the fairway. Mr. Manjourides: Right. Mr. Bickel: And, Ron, I think we addressed this in past meetings, if I remember correctly. Mr. Phillips: Not here. Mr. Bickel: I think we did, because we were talking about the pond itself and I was asking about dredging it out. Mr. Phillips: Right. Mr. Bickel: And that would be our responsibility, what it came out with, because it's uncontrollable where that water is going to lie, all the way back through that series of ponds back in there. Mr. Phillips: Well, that’s not true. It’s got one pond. Mr. Bickel: But it’s still connected with the other ponds, isn’t it? Mr. Phillips: No. That pond’s independent. Mr. Manjourides: Oh, it is. Mr. Knights: Yeah. Mr. Phillips: The pond your talking about is on. Mr. Bickel: I’m talking about number eight. Mr. Phillips: Yeah. Mr. Bickel: I thought we were told that was somehow connected through there and we couldn't control the groundwater. Mr. Knights: Not that I’m aware of. Mr. Scheerer: We’ll just have the engineer look at that particular one. Mr. Phillips: Yeah. You could increase the volume of water in there and it might help the waters from coming up. Mr. Bickel: I mean dredging it out would be. Mr. Knights: Well, increase the volume without it rising. Mr. Phillips: Well, if you increase the volume, it won’t rise. Mr. Knights: Yeah. Mr. Scheerer: You would be doing a really big assessment increase, if that’s the case. Mr. Bickel: But I thought that was going to fall back on the country club if we were to do that. Mr. Manjourides: Well, that's not on us anyways. That's on the other side. Mr. Bickel: Well, yeah, the other CDD. Mr. Knights: It’s Stoneybrook north, right? Mr. Scheerer: It’s Stoneybrook South at ChampionsGate CDD side. Mr. Knights: Oh, okay. Yeah. Mr. Scheerer: Not your Stoneybrook South. Mr. Phillips: It’s just a thought. Mr. Bickel: I know we addressed it at one point. Mr. Phillips: Okay. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. So, we're going to get proposals. Mr. Scheerer: We are going to try. Mr. Manjourides: Try to get some proposals. Mr. LeBrun: Yeah. And reach out to the golf course and see if they have any contacts. Mr. Manjourides: And then maybe get some input from them. And we should do contracts too just so that we have our own. Mr. Phillips: Maybe the engineer knows of some. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah, have the engineer. Mr. Scheerer: I can ask around too. Over at Reunion, they’ve got bulkheads at Reunion. I can talk to the director. Mr. Knights: Yeah. Everybody around here has got them. Mr. Scheerer: And then we'll also price doing the actual aquatic maintenance for the ponds. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. Mr. Scheerer: I've actually already met with Lake Doctors just to show them what we were possibly looking at. They're going to work up some general maintenance numbers that coincide with the same level of service you have now. Nothing more, nothing less. Mr. LeBrun: And we'll make sure that's included on the. Because next time we meet again, we'll be going over the budget. So, we'll make sure those added aquatic treatment costs are in the budget. Mr. Phillips: Who takes care of the pond that's right, I'm going to say, 19. But you all know where it is. The one right off of Bella Citta if you’re going. Mr. Knights: The one with the floating debris in there. Mr. Phillips: Yeah, the one that's got the floating vegetation. The wind blows. It blows over there. That's not CDD? Mr. Scheerer: I’m not sure which one you’re talking about. Mr. Knights: Okay. If you’re coming down Bella Citta, you know where the tunnel is? Mr. Scheerer: From which way? From the golf course? From west side boulevard? Mr. Knights: If you’re coming from 27. There’s a tunnel under the road right there by this pond. Mr. Scheerer: Okay. Mr. Knights: That connects this side to the other side of Bella Citta for golf carts. So, you don’t have to go across the road. There’s a pond, if you’re going that way. What am I trying to say? What direction is that? Mr. Phillips: East. Mr. Knights: If you’re going east, the pond’s on your right. Mr. Scheerer: We don’t maintain that pond. Mr. Knights: Okay. That’s what we were asking. Mr. Phillips: That’s not maintained by anyone because one time there was a guy in there with a boat doing whatever he does with that thing. Mr. Scheerer: There is what is called cogon grass treatment and that’s part of the Stoneybrook South at ChampionsGate CDD. They treat this invasive grasses in certain areas throughout that area, but that pond does not get maintained. Mr. Knights: Okay. Mr. Scheerer: That would actually be on the. Mr. Knights: Toho probably. Mr. Scheerer: golf course, maybe. I don’t know. We’re not maintaining it. We pay to have the cogon grass sprayed. Mr. Knights: Well, the tee box is on one side of the pond and the fairway is on the other side. Mr. Scheerer: I guess. Mr. Knights: I know there is. I know it is. Mr. Scheerer: I’ll get with a map, and you can show me. Mr. Knights: What I'm trying to say is it seems to me the pond is on the golf course if the tee box is here and you're going across it to get to the fairway. And it's probably one of the biggest ponds on the court. Mr. Phillips: I don’t think it is. Mr. Manjourides: Anyways. Mr. Scheerer: While we're talking, I'll look up a map and make sure I'm in the right spot. Mr. LeBrun: So, let's see if we get some information on a potential cost. Also have the engineer maybe do some more research about do we need the bulkhead; do we not need the bulkhead for stormwater? Mr. Knights: That's the key question. Do we even need the darn thing? Mr. LeBrun: Correct. We'll try to firm that up and get an opinion. If the actual bulkhead is a function of the stormwater system or a function of the golf course. I think that's a big, big important step. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. Mr. Roberts: Are you going to get quotes for landscaping as well because I know Alan is going to get the aquatics. Mr. Scheerer: I don’t know that we’re looking at doing any landscaping on the golf course side. Mr. Roberts: But it’s still your land. Mr. Scheerer: Well, we will just leave it the way it is unless the Board says differently. Mr. Manjourides: Well, I think that. Mr. Scheerer: Because that was never the intent, as far as I know. Mr. Knights: What? Mr. Scheerer: This is going to get a little bit tricky, guys. On the golf course side of the pond, there's a bunch of muhly grass. There's a bunch of grasses that border that side of the golf course. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. Mr. Scheerer: And Neil's asking if we're going to be maintaining it. It was my understanding we weren't maintaining that, but he just said, well, it's our pond. It looks to me like they're wanting us to do all the maintenance of the pond, regardless of if it is touching golf or not. Mr. Manjourides: Well, the way I understood it was they'll mow it because they're mowing the rest of the grass and that they'll just bill us for the amount that they're maintaining around the pond. Mr. Scheerer: I don’t. Mr. Roberts: Yeah. That's in the agreement. The agreement is we can do the maintenance for the landscaping on your land around the pond. Not our land, your land. And we'll also do the treatment of the ponds, but we'll bill you on a monthly basis for the cost of that. Mr. Manjourides: That has to be worked out. Mr. Roberts: There's no agreement in place. You may say it's our responsibility. There's no agreement. Mr. Manjourides: You guys do it now, right? Mr. Roberts: Well, we told them to stop doing it. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. And we’re not doing it. Mr. Manjourides: Who is doing it? Someone’s got to do it. Mr. Scheerer: We are just doing the sides that touch the homes. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Scheerer: Which has been the way it's. I'm not saying it's right. I understand there's no agreement. But the way it was originally set up, if it touched golf, golf did it. If it was touching the homes, we did it. So, we're doing the area between the homes and the water, and I guess golf isn't doing anything now. Mr. Manjourides: Well, someone has to do it. It’s going to get out of hand. Mr. Roberts: It’s your CDD land. Mr. Manjourides: I understand. Mr. LeBrun: Yes. I think what will happen. And Jason will confirm. So, what is designated as stormwater tract, that is what the CDD will maintain. What is the actual stormwater tract, the aquatics. Now, another thing that might come up is you might have people wishing to treat it a certain way, whereas for stormwater, you don't necessarily have to spray every single thing that pops up. So, you know that there's two different, I think, standards of maintenance. there's the maintenance per the permit, and then there's the maintenance that might be more aesthetically pleasing. So, I can see that might be an issue that we'll have to iron out as what's our requirement on the permit versus what does someone want to see when they look out their window at the pond? So, there's two different schools of thought. So that's another thing we'll have to. Mr. Knights: I’m a little lost. Where’s the land that we’re talking about? Mr. Scheerer: It’s the pond bank. Mr. Knights: Hang on, let me finish. I get that, but physically, where would this be in the scheme of the plat? Mr. Manjourides: How many feet? 10 feet. Mr. Knights: Yeah. That’s what I’m trying to find out. Mr. Manjourides: Is it like 10 feet that goes around the pond? Mr. Scheerer: I don't know what the exact distance is between the body of water and the top of the bank, but that area is part of the stormwater pond. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Scheerer: That's all I can tell you. We're going to have to probably go through and identify every one of them by photo. Okay. So, the Board has an idea of what they look like. Mr. Knights: That would be great. Mr. Scheerer: And then we'll have to get with the landscaper, because I would think the golf would want some input on that. But even if they do it, it sounds like they want us to pay for it regardless, so we might as well just price doing the work if that's the direction the Board wants and if that's the level we need to. Maybe we don't need to do anything. It's just muhly grasses, so we'll just have to take a look at it. Mr. Knights: These grasses you're describing. I'm ignorant to grass. Are these the grasses that get really tall. Mr. Scheerer: No. They're not going to get too tall. They'll get about yay big. Mr. Knights: Well, that's pretty big. Mr. Scheerer: Well, normally not on a pond bank. It also helps with erosion control. Mr. Knights: Okay. Mr. Scheerer: So, a lot of times they plant that. We have sod that goes down on the home side because it looks better. But on places like the golf course, they may have muhly grass or fakahatchee, some type of grass, and that is in large clumps. I know you’ve seen it. Mr. Knights: I’m sure I have. Mr. Scheerer: If we go on a golf cart, I can show you exactly what it is. But it also is a form of erosion control, so. But whether or not. Normally what we do with our grass is we cut them back once a year. Mr. Manjourides: Now, you have other golf courses you do, right? Mr. Scheerer: I don’t do any golf courses. We manage properties that have golf courses. Mr. Manjourides: And on those properties that have a pond, does the golf course maintain the grass right up to the pond? Mr. Scheerer: I can tell you at Reunion, we maintain none of the ponds on the golf course. Golf course handles all the maintenance. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Scheerer: But now what we do as part of the stormwater system, is our engineer inspects the stormwater system and any deficiencies in the system, the CDD pays for and maintains and corrects. But we don't do any of the aquatics, we don’t do any of the mowing. Mr. Manjourides: That CDD doesn't give the HOA any money to maintain any of that grass. Mr. Scheerer: No. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Is there any places, other than Reunion, that you know of, that. Mr. Scheerer: We have a golf course in Remington CDD, which is in Kissimmee by the turnpike. We spray all the ponds. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. That’s it. Mr. Scheerer: We just spray the water. The golf course maintains everything else. Mr. Manjourides: And those are on the golf course? Mr. Scheerer: Those are on the golf course. There's about 18 ponds on the Remington CDD. Mr. Manjourides: And the CDD owns the ponds. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah, we own the stormwater, which is why we spray the water quality itself. That's all. And again, if there's problems with the infrastructure that ties the ponds together, the CDD, after it's been identified by the engineer through his annual report, would pay to have those items correct. Mr. Manjourides: Interesting. Mr. Bickel: May I make a suggestion? Mr. Scheerer: Sure. Mr. Bickel: To maybe help everybody out. I don't know if it has to be a formal meeting or what we want to do, but let's just all take a ride around these ponds and actually get our eyeballs on here and then make sure we're all on the same page as to what we're talking about, what type of grass it is. Right. Just as a general understanding. Mr. Scheerer: I don't want to speak for the legal or for the District manager, but you couldn't do it together. Mr. LeBrun: Yeah. As long as you go separately. Mr. Scheerer: You’d have to do it separately to avoid Sunshine law, right? Mr. Bickel: What do you mean? Oh, our group? Mr. Scheerer: You couldn’t ride all four. Mr. Bickel: Oh, no. We could designate one guy. I don't care who it is, but like someone from your team. Someone from the Board of directors at the country club. You know what I mean? Like maybe four or five people. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. Mr. LeBrun: I think everyone has the same goal. They want the ponds to work correctly and look nice. I think we're all on the same page and just want to iron out some of those. Mr. Bickel: I'm thinking eyeballs on the project and some discussion might. Mr. Phillips: But you still need to know how far up the bank is. Mr. Bickel: Oh, I get it. But it's just a baseline. Take some pictures, just so everybody's on the same page. And I think Ron probably, no disrespect to anybody, Ron knows a lot more about these ponds than anybody else in the community, I think, with all the things that he's done, especially with the fountains and everything. So, he would be a good representative from this particular Board. Mr. Scheerer: I can ride with Ron or whoever. We can take a look. Mr. Phillips: It’s going to get warmer. Mr. Scheerer: As soon as the temperature gets up a little bit. Mr. Knights: Wednesday’s supposed to get up. Mr. Bickel: My recommendation would be to have Neil possibly, or maybe even Ethan. Mr. Roberts: Yeah. I think Ethan would be good. He’s also superintendent. Mr. Scheerer: I know Ethan. He’s a good dude. Mr. Phillips: Yeah. Mr. Bickel: But just to get your eyeballs on it. Mr. Roberts: Let’s just post it on the website the property shows you the land around the pond. Mr. Scheerer: I don’t think anybody’s disputing that. Yeah, I don’t think anybody is disputing that. Mr. Phillips: Nobody’s disputing that, but nobody knows how far that is. You know what I’m saying? It’s just an orange line around the pond. Mr. Scheerer: I can give you a pretty good idea of the field, where they go, because all the pond banks are typical. The bulkhead thing's a whole other animal. The engineer will have to deal with that. Mr. Knights: So, what do we want to decide here? First we need to know some options on new types of bulkheads. It doesn't have to be exactly, just an estimate of what the difference in costs are. So, then we can do a deeper dive and put out an RFP or whatever you want to call it here. Mr. Phillips: I think the first thing is you got to get with the engineer, and you got to find out exactly what the stormwater original plan is. Mr. Scheerer: Right. Mr. Phillips: Permit, anyway. Mr. Scheerer: And I think he's aware of that. And I know Ron, you got my number. Just let me know what day works after we get a little above 40. Mr. Knights: Okay. I would settle for above 30 right now. Mr. Scheerer: And we can do that. We can price. The getting numbers from our vendor is the easy part as far as maintenance goes. That's the easiest part in the whole thing. Mr. Bickel: So, should you table the pricing project until we have an understanding? Should we table the whole RFP and pricing process until we get an understanding. Mr. Knights: Yeah, of what we got to do. Mr. Bickel: Yeah. Mr. Phillips: Well, are we talking about that or are we talking about the bulkhead? Mr. Bickel: The bulkheads. Well, everything. Mr. Phillips: There’s only two we have to worry about. Mr. Bickel: Right. And then you can throw in the other pond issues that you might have to talk about. Mr. Phillips: I think that should be separate from the bulkhead. I think the bulkhead has two different systems. Mr. Scheerer: I think the day to day maintenance is something we could tackle once we get the numbers right now. And that goes for both CDDs, because I know they're going to want to do the same over there. And there's more ponds over there that are affected than here. Mr. Knights: The one thing I keep hearing here, though is they'll do the maintenance, and they'll choose who does the maintenance and then bill us. I'm against that. I think it's our property and we need to control. Mr. Scheerer: I agree with that. Mr. LeBrun: That's typical. Sometimes HOAs will have to get a license agreement. But yeah, I'd say if it's our ponds, the permit shows we maintain that stormwater tract that way you have control over. Mr. Knights: Otherwise, you're relinquishing control of your money because all you're doing is getting a bill that they've decided on. And no offense to them, I'm just saying it's our responsibility. Mr. LeBrun: Yeah, Vivek, I think you heard that. So essentially, the other Board members can chime in, but there may be a path forward where the CDD wishes to maintain and do their own maintenance. But feel free to chime in other Board members. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. Okay. Mr. Scheerer: I think that’s what I heard. Mr. Babbar: Yeah I think that makes sense. Motion authorizing temporary service until the next Board meeting, whatever the pond maintenance would be. Again, pond maintenance shouldn't be that much for these two ponds. Mr. Scheerer: It’s three ponds. Mr. Knights: Three, I think. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah, 18, 15, and 16. Mr. Knights: Yes, 18,15, and 16. Mr. Manjourides: The two ponds out front on 27. Mr. Scheerer: We’re already doing those. Mr. Manjourides: So, we maintain the grass? Mr. Knights: Yeah, that’s ours. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. LeBrun: Does it sound that Vivek brought up a good point. It sounds like we're eventually going to start maintaining them anyway, so it's not a bad idea to just get the ball rolling and get them serviced. So. Mr. Manjourides: Well, I'll make a motion to approve maintaining around those ponds. Mr. LeBrun: The aquatics. Doing the spraying of the pond water or also mowing around. Mr. Manjourides: The mowing and the landscaping. Someone’s has to do it. Mr. LeBrun: Yep. Mr. Knights: I agree. Mr. LeBrun: So that's to start temporary service on the aquatics and the landscaping, and then we'll bring back an updated agreement or addendum to the Board to make that permanent. On MOTION by Mr. Manjourides, seconded by Mr. Knights, with all in favor, Authorizing Temporary Service on the Aquatics and the Landscaping, was approved. Mr. Scheerer: I’ll get with Floralawn. I've already spoke with Lake Doctors. They're already working on the aquatic number. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Knights: Sounds good. Mr. Phillips: Okay, moving on. Mr. Manjourides: Now, I wanted to add we had budgeted some money for policing the school parking, but it was only for two months. Mr. LeBrun: Yeah. You guys did a not to exceed. Mr. Manjourides: Well, the cars are back. Mr. Phillips: The other day I couldn’t even get in. Mr. Knights: It’s ridiculous. Mr. Manjourides: So, we need to get them back out there. Mr. LeBrun: Okay. Did you guys want to. Mr. Knights: Oh, it amazes me. Mr. Phillips: I couldn’t get in, between the kids and the cars. Mr. Manjourides: I know. It’s ridiculous. So, we need to, I don't know, if we had $2,500. Mr. Knights: It was a maximum of $2,500 is what we approved. Mr. Manjourides: For a couple of months because it's a couple more months of school. Mr. Knights: There were so many hours randomly a day. No, it wasn't every day. It was a random day of the week. Mr. Phillips: I thought it was twice a week. Mr. Knights: Yeah, but it was random days. Mr. LeBrun: So, I went back. Yeah, so it's not to exceed $2,500. And we did it one day a week. And then during the 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. dismissal hours. That was what last time. We can redo that, and then if the Board wants to continue that, we can add that as part of the budget for next budget cycle. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. I think we should do it twice a week. Mr. LeBrun: Okay. Mr. Phillips: Have them pick random days. Mr. LeBrun: It was random. The days were random. There’s no pattern or anything. Mr. Manjourides: I would go for twice a week. Mr. Phillips: We got to get them to give tickets out though, so word gets out. Mr. Knights: It’s $150 ticket. Mr. Scheerer: That’s at their discretion. Mr. LeBrun: And I usually put a note in there that says, please enforce all rules with citation. Mr. Knights: Yeah because a parking ticket is a buck fifty. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. Mr. Knights: You start giving out $150 tickets, they’re going to think twice about doing it. Mr. Phillips: The word will get out to the people, and they’ll stop. Mr. LeBrun: Yeah, so I heard that. So, you want to do a not to exceed $2,500 and then two days a week. Mr. Manjourides: How much is it a week? Mr. Knights: It’s like $80 per visit, per time or something. Mr. Scheerer: Four hours. Mr. LeBrun: Yeah, I think it's four hours. So, it's like $250 per visit, so that’s a month. It would be 30 days essentially. Mr. Bickel: You want to extend it out to two months? Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. I think we should do two months. Mr. Knights: So, $5,000. Mr. LeBrun: $5,000. Okay. Mr. Knights: Yeah. Mr. Manjourides: You got to get them to start. Mr. Scheerer: You got four months of school left. Mr. Knights: Yeah. If we can get them for two months and get their attention. Mr. LeBrun: You want two months at two visits for per week. Okay, we can do that. Mr. Knights: And Jeremy, if you include Mark Lustra in your correspondence with the police, he can help you there. Mr. LeBrun: Okay. Yeah, I think I involved him last time. Mr. Knights: Yeah. I gave you his name last time. Mr. LeBrun: Yeah and they routed me to their assigner. It was really helpful, really easy. Mr. Knights: He's out of town a lot now, though, but he still answers his phone. Mr. LeBrun: Okay. Mr. Manjourides: And then I think he should send the note to the school, too. Mr. LeBrun: Yep. Oh, yeah. We let them know. Mr. Knights: Yeah. If they could just stop letting kids out that back door. That's part of the problem. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. I know. Mr. LeBrun: Yep. All right. Mr. Bickel: Or assign a crossing guard. Mr. Knights: Well, that would be, the county would have to do that. Mr. Manjourides: Do we need a motion? Mr. LeBrun: Yes. Not to exceed. Mr. Knights: I’ll move. $5,000. Mr. LeBrun: It was not to exceed. Mr. Knights: $5,000 Mr. LeBrun: $5,000, two times a week. Mr. Phillips: Crossing guard and all that crap for the kids to cross there. Mr. Scheerer: Well, that’s issued by. Mr. Phillips: We went through that with Mark and whatever. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. Mr. Manjourides: I’ll second it. On MOTION by Mr. Knights, seconded by Mr. Manjourides, with all in favor, a Not to Exceed $5,000 for Two Times Per Week Off- Duty Traffic Officer, was approved. Mr. LeBrun: So, I'll get that set up right away. Like I said, I'll do random days. Mr. Knights: Thank you. Mr. LeBrun: Yep. No problem. Mr. Knights: You should still have that lady’s contact. Mr. LeBrun: Yep, I have it all. Mr. Knights: Good. Mr. LeBrun: That little form they fill out, it's very easy. FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Staff Reports A. District Counsel Mr. LeBrun: All right, we'll move down to our staff reports. District counsel, Vivek, you still with us? Mr. Babbar: Yep, still here. Nothing further to discuss. Happy to answer any questions if there are any. Mr. LeBrun: Any questions for counsel? Mr. Manjourides: No. B. District Engineer Mr. LeBrun: Bring us down to our engineer, Jason, anything to report besides what you've already reported on? I don’t hear Jason on the line anymore. C. District Manager Mr. LeBrun: I have nothing further to report than what we've already discussed. I've been taking notes on like our action items on follow up and bring back. Our next meeting, we start the budget process. That's for Fiscal Year 2027, which starts October 1. So, if you have any, and Alan might go through this in his field manager as well, if you have any capital projects or things that might come up next for next year, just shoot us an email. That way we can look at it and get it factored in. D. Field Manager Mr. Phillips: Alan, I have one thing. What's with the lights on. On the pond? The fountain? Mr. Scheerer: Which pond? Which fountain? Mr. Phillips: The one on the roundabout. The tower thing. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. Mr. Scheerer: Oh, you mean the pump. Mr. Phillips: The pump. Mr. Scheerer: Oh, yeah, yeah. I was going to touch base on it. After the last meeting you noticed the top portion started to work? Yeah, that was a faulty impeller. Shortly after that meeting, the bottom half went out, so they had to pull the motor. It's back in the shop. They're trying to diagnose the problem. Mr. Phillips: What about the lights? The lights don’t work either. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah, I wasn’t aware of the lights not working. Mr. Phillips: I emailed you. You said you knew about it. Mr. Scheerer: No, we reset the lights. They should have all been working. I’ll double check them again. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. They pulled the motor out. Okay. I went down into the hole and I was looking at it. Mr. Scheerer: Shame on you. Mr. Manjourides: The pump broke inside where the propeller goes. Mr. Scheerer: Right. Mr. Manjourides: When they pull the pump out, there's pieces of the pump still in there. I grabbed one of the pieces and it's metal disc that was all torn apart. Mr. Phillips: That’s probably the impeller. Mr. Manjourides: Impeller. So, I left it right where you screw the motor on, and I don't know what they're diagnosing. Are they just have to get a new propeller to put in there? Mr. Scheerer: Well, it could be more damage to the motor or something. I can't speak to that. Mr. Manjourides: I know. I’m just saying. Mr. Scheerer: I understand if you find a piece of an impeller, it's going to break. You're going to have damage to that. But it also could have some internal damage, and I can't speak to that. So, I'm just waiting on Cascade to get back with the actual repair and what it's going to cost us. As soon as they do, I'll get it. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. The other thing is, the last time they fixed it, was it a new piece or was it a rebuilt piece? Mr. Scheerer: I believe they rebuilt the pump. I'd have to go back and check because it's been a few months since that's happened, but I believe they rebuilt the pump and then they had to replace the impeller. So, they replaced and put in a brand new impeller. Mr. Manjourides: So, when you say the pump, is that the motor? Mr. Scheerer: Well, you got a pump assembly where the impeller is, that's what pushes the water up into the fountain. The motor's separate. It attaches to the pump. The impeller is inside on the shaft. Mr. Manjourides: Right. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. Mr. Manjourides: So, they wouldn't rebuild the pump. Mr. Scheerer: There's moving parts within the pump and the impeller. I can't. I can't. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Scheerer: Without seeing the whole thing and trying to get into the diagnostic aspect of that. I’ll try to get a complete diagnostic. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. Can you get a report from them on exactly what they're doing and what parts are new? Mr. Scheerer: I know the invoice just said replaced impeller, but there was much more work. There's seals in there. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah, I understand the seals and all. Mr. Scheerer: Stuff like that, so. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Scheerer: And once they bring that other one back and get it in there. Mr. Manjourides: There’s no warranty on those things? Mr. Scheerer: No. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. All right Mr. Scheerer: So, as it's been pretty cold. So, we're going to see what damage we have landscape wise after we warm up. Mr. Manjourides: Absolutely. Mr. Scheerer: I was hoping Casey would be here today. The typical protocols is whatever is burnt, we're going to try to cut back and probably wait until spring to assess any damages. The District manager said we are going into budget at your next meeting. So, if we need to allocate any funding for landscape improvements, we'll go ahead and do that at that time. Irrigation inspections are ongoing. The fountains are working. The work at the Bella Citta entrance as well as the 27 entrance for all the monument repairs is complete. We'll be looking at the rest of them for the April meeting to see if we need to allocate funding for any of the other archways and monuments as far as that goes. And other than that. Mr. Manjourides: You got the fountain working pretty good on the 27? Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. Knock on wood. Mr. Manjourides: Yeah. I don’t know. Did they do anything? Mr. Scheerer: Nope. Mr. Phillips: Did they ever fix that pole that got knocked down by a car? There was a light pole laying on the ground. I don’t remember. Mr. Scheerer: I don’t remember either. Mr. Phillips: It’s right by the entrance on 27. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. Oh, that's the one that's on 27. I didn't look at it when I was out last week. I didn't get out here this morning until about 8:30 a.m. And then I know I talked with Chris. We've been trying to get new benches for around the architectural fountain. We've canceled that order. I've gotten with our Tampa staff. They've got a company called Uline. And I think we found some that'll fit here and hopefully be able to turn them around the next 30 days. Mr. LeBrun: Good. Mr. Scheerer: And then like I said, I'll get with the landscape contractor. And I've already talked to the aquatic contractor about these additional ponds. Mr. Manjourides: Okay. Mr. Scheerer: That’s all I have. Mr. Phillips: Check the lights. Mr. Scheerer: As soon as the meetings are over. I bet he turned them off. Mr. Manjourides: They’re on manual. They’re supposed to be on all the time. Mr. Scheerer: You shouldn’t be in that pit. Mr. Knights: I’ve seen him turn them on, but I’ve never seen them turn them off. Mr. Scheerer: You be careful down here, Chris. SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Supervisor’s Request Mr. LeBrun: That brings us down to our supervisor request. Do we have any supervisor requests? There is none. SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment Mr. LeBrun: We just need a motion to adjourn. On MOTION by Mr. Knights, seconded by Mr. Phillips, with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned. Signature - Jeremy Lebrun Signature - Jeremy LebrunSignature - Chris Manjourides Signature - Chris Manjourides Secretary/Assistant Secretary Chairman/Vice Chairman